Ontologies

Community of Practice

Welcome!

Community members gathered at the 2018 PhenoHarmonIS workshop, the biennial event hosted by the Ontologies Community of Practice.

The Ontologies Community of Practice brings together researchers, modelers, information specialists, data managers, and ontology experts from the CGIAR research network, academia, and the private sector, thus creating a critical mass of expertise to tackle the major issues related to semantics for FAIR data in agri-food science.

The CoP provides the ideal forum for co-learning and knowledge exchange on ontologies and for guiding consistent data annotation, as well as the deployment of quality ontologies in databases and repositories. The CoP stimulates exchanges between domain experts and experts in ontology design, knowledge modeling, ontology-driven applications, and semantic web technologies

The CoP is led by the Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT and was launched by the CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture.

This webpage presents the different working groups of the CoP, lists the tools developed by CoP members, and displays the latest news. For further details on the CoP’s goals and achievements, read the paper published in Patterns.

Ontologies are important to all data-driven research, and this CoP serves as an intermediary to assess common goals, needs, and opportunities across the CoPs and working groups of the Platform.

The Ontologies CoP harnesses in-house and external expertise in the development of ontologies and supports the other BIG DATA CoPs toward finding adequate ontologies for data description. The Ontologies CoP has the objective of establishing best practices and guidelines in the selection of ontologies of reference and developing and curating ontologies in the agri-food domain.

The Ontologies CoP works to include data generated by the latest technologies and to expand beyond crops to data on fisheries and aquaculture, livestock, socio-economics, water management, and agroecology. The Ontologies CoP’s thematic working groups currently develop ontologies such as the Crop Ontology (CO), the Agronomy Ontology (AgrO), and the Socio-Economic Ontology (SEOnt).

Get in touch

CoP Lead

Elizabeth Arnaud | Email
Elizabeth leads the Ontologies CoP and is a scientist at the Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT in Montpellier, France

CoP Communication

Céline Aubert | Email
The International Food Policy Research Institute, France

Read the Ontologies CoP paper

Visit the Ontologies CoP YouTube channel

Engage with the Community

BE INFORMED

Tune in to the latest CoP updates by subscribing to our newsletter.

ENGAGE

Interact with community members through our LinkedIn Group.



CONTRIBUTE

Share your expertise in our working groups.

See our Working Groups

Working groups

Plant Phenotypes Ontologies

The Plant Phenotypes Ontologies WG develops and maintains the community-built Crop Ontology (CO) compiling traits and variables per crop species. CO fosters the standardization of data including data recorded on phenotyping platforms, collected during food processing, generated from consumers’ surveys and used to describe ecological interventions.

This work enriches the species-agnostic reference ontologies of the Planteome project:

The Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT leads the working group in collaboration with CGIAR centers, Boyce Thompson Institute, members of ELIXIR-EXCELERATE, Phenome Projects, and the Jaiswal Lab of the Oregon State University.

See Ontologies Development Leaders

See Ontologies Development Partners

See CGIAR Crop Ontology Curators

Guillaume Bauchet
Breeding Bioinformatician, Boyce Thompson Institute
Banana ontology

Jing Yu
Genome Database Curator, Washington State University
Cotton ontology

Vilma Rocio Hualla Mamani
Data Management Specialist, International Potato Center
Sweet potato and potato ontologies

Abhishek Rathore
Principal Scientist and Theme Leader, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics
Chickpea, finger millet, groundnut, pearl millet, pigeonpea, and sorghum crop ontologies

Roma Rani Das
Statistician, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics
Chickpea, finger millet, groundnut, pearl millet, pigeonpea, and sorghum crop ontologies

Praveen Reddy Teegala
Programmer-cum-Systems Analyst, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics
Chickpea, finger millet, groundnut, pearl millet, pigeonpea, and sorghum crop ontologies

Afolabi Agbona
Data Manager, IITA
Cassava and yam ontologies

Noel Madalla
Bioversity International
Banana ontology

Rosemary Shrestha
Data Coordinator, CIMMYT
Wheat and maize ontologies

Marie Angélique Laporte
Associate Scientist, Bioversity International
Global Curator

Julian Pietragalla
Regional Deployment Manager, Latin America, Integrated Breeding Platform
Global Curator

Fish Ontology

The Fish Ontology Working Group aims to enable easy aggregation and analysis of data. This will be done by describing the fisheries terminologies that enhance data quality, thus ensuring that fisheries-related datasets can be integrated and used in more efficient ways.

The Fish Ontology Working Group was formed in April 2019 and is currently led by WorldFish with the support of Bioversity International.

Agronomy Ontology

AgrO, the Agronomy Ontology, provides semantically described agronomic terms to facilitate the standards-annotated collection, storage and use of agronomic data, enabling easy aggregation and analysis. AgrO is being built using traits identified by agronomists, the ICASA variables, and other existing ontologies such as ENVO, UO, and PATO. A key use case for AgrO is the Agronomy Field Information Management System (AgroFIMS) that enables digital collection of agronomic data that is semantically described a priori with agronomic terms from AgrO. This effort involves multiple centers and is lead by IFPRI and the Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT.

Socio-Economic Ontology (SEONT)

A socio-economic ontology of controlled vocabularies, classifications, and concordances that allow standardization of key indicators. The key is that SEONT is a ‘living’ ontology, since the high variety of socio-economic data implies that it will need to evolve continuously.

The ontology has been developed by CGIAR researchers from the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Bioversity International, and the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT). The working group on the socio-economic ontology works in close collaboration with the SED CoP led by Gideon Kruseman. The working group is led by Soonho Kim of IFPRI.

Interested in contributing to the development of these ontologies?

Community News

Webinar – The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance

November 26, 2021 / Hannah Craig

This webinar by the Ontologies Community of Practice presents the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. Given that most Indigenous ...

Webinar – Cocoa Ontology: A collaborative pathway for FAIR data

October 28, 2021 / Hannah Craig

This webinar by the Ontologies Community of Practice presents the integrated data collection workflow that has been developed to make ...

Webinar – Labelled property graphs, Web Ontology Language, and WebProtégé

September 9, 2021 / Hannah Craig

This webinar by the Ontologies Community of Practice presents work on making WebProtégé compatible with a labelled property graph representation ...

Webinar – Governance operational model for ontologies (GOMO)

August 9, 2021 / Hannah Craig

This webinar by the Ontologies Community of Practice presents the governance operational model for ontologies (GOMO) which establishes an agile ...

Webinar – Ontology tools provided by EBI: OLS, ZOOMA, OxO

June 29, 2021 / Lorna Pizzaro Madera

This webinar by the Ontologies Community of Practice presents OLS, ZOOMA, & OxO– platforms developed by the ontology tools team ...

FAO cooperates with CGIAR to increase interoperability between food and agricultural information systems

June 8, 2021 / Lorna Pizzaro Madera

CGIAR and FAO announce new collaboration aiming to enhance data sharing in the food and agricultural sector through the AGROVOC ...

Resources

Tools & Publications

Ontology registries

Agroportal offers a reference ontology repository for agronomy.
Ontobee is aimed to facilitate ontology data sharing, visualization, query, integration, and analysis.
Ontology Look up Service of the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI-EMBL)

Ontologies developed/curated by the CoP

Agronomy Ontology provides standardized terms to describe agronomic practices, techniques, and variables used in agronomic experiments.
Crop Ontology Curation Tool enables you to browse the Crop Ontology, search for specific terms and access the definition, as well as additional information.
Planteome provides a suite of reference and species-specific ontologies for plants and annotations to genes and phenotypes.

View tools

Fairsharing is a curated, informative and educational resource on data and metadata standards, inter-related to databases and data policies.
Obo-Foundry has the objective to develop a family of interoperable ontologies that are both logically well-formed and scientifically accurate.
Wheat Data Interoperability Guidelines provides a common framework for describing, representing, linking and publishing wheat data with respect to open standards.

Documents

2017 Work Plan – Detailed description of expected outcomes and deliverables for 2017
2018 Work Plan – Detailed description of expected outcomes and deliverables for 2018
2019 Work Plan – Detailed description of expected outcomes and deliverables for 2019
2020 Work Plan – Detailed description of expected outcomes and deliverables for 2020
2021 Work Plan – Detailed description of expected outcomes and deliverables for 2021
Crop Ontology leaflet
Dimensions to consider when identifying an ontology for data

Workshops

Webinars

Find all recordings of previous webinars and sessions.

Webinar – The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance

Webinar – Cocoa Ontology: A collaborative pathway for FAIR data

Webinar – Labelled property graphs, Web Ontology Language, and WebProtégé

Webinar – Governance operational model for ontologies (GOMO)

Webinar – Ontology tools provided by EBI: OLS, ZOOMA, OxO

Training Sessions

Find recordings and materials of all hands-on training sessions.

Training Session – Searching and requesting new terms in ontologies

Communities

AGRONOMY

CROP MODELING

GEOSPATIAL

INFO & DATA MANAGEMENT

LIVESTOCK

ONTOLOGIES

SOCIO-ECONOMIC



Interested in joining our community of practice?

Search the website

Discover agricultural data and publications

Powered by GARDIAN

Become a youth in data partner

Submit an initiative!

AgroFIMS: Your new companion for easy standardization of data collection and description

The Agronomy Field Information Management System (AgroFIMS) allows users to create fieldbooks to collect agronomic data that is already tied to a metadata standard (the CG Core Metadata Schema, aligned with the standard Dublin Core), and semantic standards like the Agronomy Ontology (AgrO), generating data that is Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) at collection. AgroFIMS therefore standardizes data collection and description for easy aggregation and inter-linking across disparate datasets. The fieldbooks you create can be exported to the Android-based KDSmart data collection application, and collected data imported back to AgroFIMS for statistical analysis and reports. In 2021 AgroFIMS will allow you to set up agronomic survey questionnaires, for data collection via ODK. It will also allow easy upload of your “born FAIR” data to Dataverse repository platforms with Dublin Core-compliant metadata schemas. Funding for AgroFIMS was provided by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s Open Access, Open Data Initiative, and the CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture. AgroFIMS is under GPL license. Go to AGROFIMS →

Responsible Data Management Guidelines to protect privacy

CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture advocates open data for agricultural research for development. It considers that opening up research data for scrutiny and reuse confers significant benefits to society.

However, the Platform appreciates that not all research data can be open and that a broad range of legitimate circumstances may require data to be restricted.

As an integral component of its advocacy for open data, the Platform promotes responsible data management through the entire research data lifecycle from planning, collecting, storing, disclosing or publishing, transferring, discovery and archiving.

These guidelines were created from information collected from: review on best and emerging practices across various sectors in the fast changing landscape of privacy and ethics (130 external resources); privacy and ethic materials sourced from seven CGIAR centers; first draft was circulated for input and feedback across CGIAR and incorporated into this edition. It’s important to note that this is an evolving document, the next stage is to consult externally for further input.

These Guidelines are intended to assist agricultural researchers handle privacy and personally identifiable information (PII) in the research project data lifecycle.

Check the guidelines →

REUSE / TRANSFER

Ensure consistency with the DMP-PII and the purpose for which prior informed consent has been obtained
Revaluate likelihood of (re-)identification and risk of harm, particularly if it involves a public data-set containing PII (as above)
Ensure PII is stored securely to protect privacy (as above)
Minimize use of PII and risk of disclosure through pro-privacy access controls and analytical tools (as above)

Don’t transfer data containing PII unless have explicit consent
Don’t transfer data containing PII in the absence of a data sharing agreement identifying aspects such as purpose and scope of use, privacy protections measures, confidentiality and any limitations)
Don’t reuse or transfer PII until any inconsistencies with the DMP-PII and/or purpose compatibility have been resolved (e.g. through updated ethics review or consent from participant)

ARCHIVING / DISCARDING

Plan for archiving or data destruction early in the process. Destroying data can be more secure, however, archiving can be beneficial if the data has ongoing evidentiary, scientific or cultural value. If archiving, identify where and how, the budget require
Ensure DMP-PII and purpose compatibility (as above)
Ensure adequate security measures to protect privacy (as above)

Don’t wait until the end of the project to assess archiving needs when time and resources may be limited
Don’t assume the longevity of a particular format, future-proof your archives data
Don’t forget to budget for archiving data, this should be done as part of your Data Management Plan

PUBLISHING AND DISCOVERY

Ensure DMP-PII and purpose compatibility (as above)
Revaluate likelihood of (re-)identification and risk of harm, particularly if it involves a public data-set containing PII
Indicate in metadata the availability of raw data or minimized data containing PII, if available bilaterally
Minimize use of PII and risk of disclosure through pro-privacy access controls and analytical tools

Don’t include PII in public datasets unless absolutely necessary to preserve the data’s analytic potential, scientific utility or benefit to the participant (and subject to participants informed consent and a rigorous risk assessment)

STORAGE AND ANALYSIS

Ensure compatibility with the DMP-PII (as above) and also the purpose for which prior informed consent has been obtained

Ensure PII is stored securely to protect privacy, through organizational or project specific safeguards to prevent unauthorized access, accidental disclosure or breach of data (physical & technical)

encryption for the storage and transmission of PII
access control measures to limited access to PII
two-factor or multifactor authentication
cloud services & back-end security

Don’t store data in unsecured locations or on unsecured devices or servers

Don’t store encrypted data and encryption keys in locations where they can be easily accessed simultaneously

Don’t underestimate the importance and value of administrative safeguards to standardize practices (i.e. organizational policies, procedures and maintenance of security measures that are designed to protect private information, data and access)

COLLECTION

Ensure compatibility with the DMP-PII
De-identify data to anonymize by default unless it will impair the data’s analytic potential, scientific utility or benefit to the participant,
If you cannot anonymize, minimize the PII and pseudonymize to reduce the disclosure risk
Provide research participants sufficient information to use reasoned judgment to decide whether or not they wish to participate in the project
Ensure informed consent is designed to address the following elements:
- competence, comprehension, full disclosure, voluntariness
- legitimate scientific purpose for which the PII is collected and scope of use (e.g. stored, transferred, published and whether as anonymized, minimized or raw data)
- foreseeable risk of privacy loss and consequences
- meaningful alternatives including opt-in protection/anonymization
- safeguards to protect privacy, conditions on which PII may be shared and any limitations on reuse or third- party access and use of PII
- permission to follow-up or contact the participant and for what purpose (including by third- parties)
- participant’s right to withdraw and rights regarding their data (e.g. to be informed; to access; to rectify; to object; to erase)
- inclusion of physical, phone and/or electronic contact (at least two forms of contact) that participant can reach to exert her/rights
- explicit consent and participant’s acknowledgement of understanding
- if written, provide the participant a copy of processed informed consent
Use plain language and adapt informed consent to meet the needs of vulnerable populations (e.g. obtain orally or in local language)

Don’t collect PII unless you have a Data Management Plan and any necessary approvals in place, including the recorded approval of the potential participant
Don’t collect PII unless you absolutely need it
Don’t assume that removal of direct identifiers is sufficient to anonymize data or that all de-identification techniques will result in anonymized data. Consider the risk of re-identification of a research participant, particularly if datasets are combined. If there is a reasonable risk of re-identification the information should be handled as PII (i.e. undertake risk analysis, evaluate stronger anonymization techniques, seek informed consent for the disclosure of data and explain its possible consequences)
Don’t include vulnerable participants or communities if their ability or capacity to provide voluntary informed consent is genuinely in question
Don’t underestimate the potential of quasi or indirect identifiers to identify an individual, particularly the inherent ability of location-based data to identify participants and their communities, and the increased risk of harm this may pose to potentially vulnerable individuals/communities
Avoid seeking overly broad consent that may call into question transparency or a research participant’s understanding regarding the use of their PII, be specific regarding the activities, purpose and limitations associated with PII so that the participant can make a genuinely informed decision and downstream users can evaluate purpose compatibility and seek fresh consent if needed

PLANNING AND APPROVAL

Develop a Data Management Plan which governs the handling of PII in the research project and beyond (DMP-PII). It should address:
- the type and nature of PII
- compliance requirements (including necessary forms for obtaining consent, and ethics clearance, if applicable)
- legitimate research objectives that will be advanced by the PII
- foreseeable risks and consequences if participants are identified from the data
- privacy protection measures (or lack thereof) for collection, storage, transfer and publishing
- process for obtaining informed consent
- timeframe or trigger for archiving or deletion of PII
Employ stricter standards for research involving vulnerable populations such as children or illiterate participants or sensitive data such as ethnicity or religious beliefs
Undertake due-diligence of datasets previously collected by you or third parties to ensure you are entitled/permitted to use for your research project
Consult the legal, IRB or ethics clearance committee or any other relevant institutional group for specific institutional, local, regional or national policies and regulatory frameworks that may apply to PII in the context of your work

Don’t leave the handling of PII and privacy protection as an after-thought, plan ahead!
Don’t forget to check local laws and donor or third-party requirements in addition to institutional policies governing research ethics and privacy protection (seek expert support if unsure!)
Don’t ignore ethical practices/standards, if your institution does not have an ethics framework or clearance process in place self-assess!
In assessing whether information is capable of identifying someone (i.e. PII) don’t limit your focus to direct identifiers, also consider indirect/quasi identifiers. Appreciate this will depend on the context of the research project, the data in question and external data which is or may become otherwise available (i.e. there is no exhaustive list).
In assessing risk of harm don’t forget to consider potential harm to the participant’s community or groups of individuals that can otherwise be identified or associated with the participant

Ontologies

Welcome!

More

Get in touch

CoP Lead

CoP Communication

Engage with the Community

BE INFORMED

ENGAGE

CONTRIBUTE

Working groups

Plant Phenotypes Ontologies

See Ontologies Development Leaders

See Ontologies Development Partners

See CGIAR Crop Ontology Curators

Fish Ontology

Agronomy Ontology

Socio-Economic Ontology (SEONT)

Interested in contributing to the development of these ontologies?

Community News

Resources

Tools & Publications

Ontology registries

Ontologies developed/curated by the CoP

View tools

Documents

Workshops

Webinars

Training Sessions

Communities

Interested in joining our community of practice?

Search the website

Discover agricultural data and publications

Powered by GARDIAN

Become a youth in data partner

Submit an initiative!

AgroFIMS: Your new companion for easy standardization of data collection and description

Responsible Data Management Guidelines to protect privacy

<img class="wp-image-93311 aligncenter" src="https://bigdata.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/REUSE_arrow.png" alt="" width="100" height="100" />

REUSE / TRANSFER

<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-92805 aligncenter" src="https://bigdata.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/tips-icon-orange-100px.png" alt="" width="100" height="100" />

<img class=" wp-image-93476 aligncenter" src="https://bigdata.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/DONT-DO-ICON.png" alt="" width="100" height="100" />

ARCHIVING / DISCARDING

<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-92805 aligncenter" src="https://bigdata.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/tips-icon-orange-100px.png" alt="" width="100" height="100" />

<img class=" wp-image-93476 aligncenter" src="https://bigdata.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/DONT-DO-ICON.png" alt="" width="100" height="100" />

<img class="wp-image-93312 aligncenter" src="https://bigdata.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/rss-transparent-300x300px.png" alt="" width="100" height="100" />

PUBLISHING AND DISCOVERY

<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-92805 aligncenter" src="https://bigdata.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/tips-icon-orange-100px.png" alt="" width="100" height="100" />

<img class=" wp-image-93476 aligncenter" src="https://bigdata.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/DONT-DO-ICON.png" alt="" width="100" height="100" />

<img class="wp-image-93295 aligncenter" src="https://bigdata.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/data-analysis-icon.png" alt="" width="100" height="100" />

STORAGE AND ANALYSIS

<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-92805 aligncenter" src="https://bigdata.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/tips-icon-orange-100px.png" alt="" width="100" height="100" />

<img class=" wp-image-93476 aligncenter" src="https://bigdata.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/DONT-DO-ICON.png" alt="" width="100" height="100" />

<img class=" wp-image-93249 aligncenter" src="https://bigdata.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/data-collection-icon.png" alt="" width="100" height="75" />

COLLECTION

<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-92805 aligncenter" src="https://bigdata.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/tips-icon-orange-100px.png" alt="" width="100" height="100" />

<img class=" wp-image-93476 aligncenter" src="https://bigdata.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/DONT-DO-ICON.png" alt="" width="100" height="100" />

<img class=" wp-image-93217 aligncenter" src="https://bigdata.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/planning-icon.png" alt="" width="100" height="114" />

PLANNING AND APPROVAL

<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-92805 aligncenter" src="https://bigdata.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/tips-icon-orange-100px.png" alt="" width="100" height="100" />

<img class=" wp-image-93476 aligncenter" src="https://bigdata.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/DONT-DO-ICON.png" alt="" width="100" height="100" />